Difference between revisions of "Bugs & Features"

From Data Quality Toolkit
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 42: Line 42:
 
{| {{table}}
 
{| {{table}}
 
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''#Feature No.'''
 
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''#Feature No.'''
 +
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Name'''
 
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Description'''
 
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Description'''
 
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''@Reporting date'''
 
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''@Reporting date'''
Line 47: Line 48:
 
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Comments'''
 
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Comments'''
 
|-
 
|-
|# || ||||||||
+
|#1||Summary Report ||Produce summarized export of test results (human readable), e.g. tested items: 100; bug No. 1: 50 of 100 items wrong format, bug No. 2: 20 of 100 items scientific name not recognized, etc. ||15 Nov 12||suggested feature||This would allow providers/ coordinators to assess the data quality of a provider in a better way.||
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 14:17, 15 November 2012

Bugs

Please, report any bugs encountered during testing. Describe the bug so that also provider can understand the problem.

#Issue No. Name Description Assigned to @Reporting date Status Comments
#1 Server Timeout? <!--<Annotations> <Annotation> <Context>OpenUP</Context> <ISODateTime>2012-11-15T10:29:09.180Z</ISODateTime> <MethodOrAgent>ODIS V0.1</MethodOrAgent> <Type>Warning</Type> <Message>Access denied to media object.</Message> <Suggestion></Suggestion> </Annotation> </Annotations> Peer Schwirtz BGBM @unknown open


Features

Please report any features, which should be implemented. Features are defined as real improvement/ new functionalities of the current tool.

#Feature No. Name Description @Reporting date Status Comments
#1 Summary Report Produce summarized export of test results (human readable), e.g. tested items: 100; bug No. 1: 50 of 100 items wrong format, bug No. 2: 20 of 100 items scientific name not recognized, etc. 15 Nov 12 suggested feature This would allow providers/ coordinators to assess the data quality of a provider in a better way.